A Memoir and Three Plays
What started off as an exceptionally challenging play to read, turned out to be an
enjoyable play to watch. The play taught us about friendship and loyalty. This war story was one that definitely showed a group of men that knew there role. They knew there role as in the sense of what their actual presence in the war was.
Black Watch was a play based upon an interview of former soldiers who served in Iraq.
It is a play where each soldier tells a story about their experience in the war. A play that describes the politics involved in the war from the perspective of Scottish soldiers. It allowed them to express their likes and dislikes about their experiences.
They spoke bluntly which shows the level of fear. At times they felt powerful to be in a unit such as Black Watch. It shows how they united as a team and also how some desolated themselves once they were enlisted. It demonstrated their experiences during their enlistment and how they feel about the unit now. Some soldiers felt like they were destined to join, others felt it was an opportunity. The play as well as the soldier’s experiences changed not only the soldiers but the view of the viewers.
Black Watch is a visual example demonstrating what being in a war is like. It is an eye opener for males or even females who think it may be easy. The men in Black Watch developed relationships that were strong while they were I Iraq as well as when they returned home. The interviewer that felt it was necessary to interview the soldiers was able to get a visual of their experiences by just listening to their stories. Even though he was just the interviewer, I am sure he got that sense of being a soldier himself. The soldiers gave an excellent description on what they saw, the friends that were injured friends they lost.
I know u said not speak about our likes or dislikes about the pieces we choose, but Jarhead was definitely one of the best pieces we read. The memoir showed the life of a marine and his experiences as a jarhead. He spoke about love and his sexual experiences with different women. Swafford was one that understood what he was and what he would become if he survived the war.
He spoke of family relationships and friendships. He believed that every man that had the opportunity to be part of a war will always have a story to tell whether it be the truth or not. Swafford wrote about what the soldiers' desires were. He described that they desired action, to just be part of what was taking place on the battlefield. He started and ended relationships as a Jarhead and felt respected when he came home.
The memoir showed the importance of the contact the soldiers need from their family. Even the contact of a mere stranger was important for their sanity and boredom. They performed acts to help with their boredom. For instance, the Wall of Shame, where every soldier placed something about their wives or girlfriends on the Wall of Shame for everyone to see. This became comedy for some and a way to vent for others. May even have been a way of letting go for them.
Swafford basically used his memoir to complain about his life as a Jarhead. He also used it to complain about his relationships before he became a Jarhead. He explained what being a Jarhead was like. He felt that if he complained, things would change. He and many don’t understand why they are still alive and many others dead. He is complaining because he didn’t get to be part of the excitement in the war. My knowledge tells me that he was not only writing this play to complain, particularly, but to inform everyone that wars will never end. He wanted to let the world know that your sons will change and your husbands will never be the same.
Pillowman was a book that was very interesting and full of surprises. The book was a demonstration of what some people see as just a story and others see as a way to bring a story to life. It also showed the compassion one can have for his work. It showed the results of torture. Do you believe torture is effective? As I read Pillowman my view of torture stayed the same. In my opinion, I believe torture is not a way for the authorities or for anyone to use. It is a force that can or will not work for every situation. As seen in this piece, you can achieve getting the truth out of someone or just a confession that is not the truth. You can create monsters or destroy someone’s life for good.
Katurian was seen as someone, to me as a loyal individual. He wrote the books because it’s what he was tortured to become, a writer. Why I said he was tortured, because as a child he was led to believe that monsters existed one of the rooms in his home. His brother Michael was actually the person that was tortured. Two people that believe in torture, a mother and a father tortured and sacrificed one child for the other. They felt this was moral. The torture that Michael experienced, I can’t even define. Can anyone define it, torture that is?
The play was a play within itself. There were stories which Katurian wrote that kept the play interesting. The stories were clear depictions of the murders that Michael imitated. Katurian may have felt that there was never a happy ending to his life story. With the constant screaming and sounds of torture he experienced, he wrote stories about little children that never had a happy ending. These stories were a metaphor of what Katurian was or had become. He was sad inside, torn and it was a way to sort of escape from his past. His stories illustrated what he felt and where he was going, nowhere. He had to deal with the authorities that did not care about his stories but only how they were going to get him to confess.
The Mercy Seat was actually the very first piece that we read. It was a play about a man and a woman in a relationship committing infidelity. It is a play which led us to believe that it was about a man that was trying to find the easy way out in life. He was using a tragedy to escape responsibility. Ben saw the disaster of 9/11 as an opportunity to run off to an island with Abby.
Abby was the girlfriend that was older and also Ben's boss. Abby was considered to be just as weak as Ben appeared. Ben actually believed he would be looked as a hero by his family and the country.
I thought that Abby seemed to be an intelligent woman and I think she even wondered at one point why he bothered to be in this relationship. I think she felt she was in love with him because of some sort of guilt. As if having a bigger income was sort of what Ben would view as something she had over him. Maybe it was the authority of her position as well.
The fact that in the end it turned out to be to be the total opposite of what the author led us to believe, made the play even better for me. The play was not really about a man that wanted to escape his family but about a man that wanted to get out of a relationship that he cared nothing about. He didn’t really love Abby. It was what it was, but Ben was too weak to end a relationship he wanted to be through with.

